Breaking Down The Covid-19 Bar Lawsuit

Breaking Down The Covid-19 Bar Lawsuit

3 a lot any kind of federal action state action whether it's legislative or executive order.

You can always challenge the constitutionality of it that is going to federal question to you filing a federal court.

And what you're doing is you're asking the court to declare it unconstitutional and issue an injunction to stop the enforcement up it and so it's like a restraining.

Where you're asking for the court to say you can't do this.

This is an illegal law so that's what they ask for their asked for.

Or debt but punitive really anything that so they are.

That they have a bark the twenty opinion was issued a few days ago instead this will take over.

That being an over reach of his.

The card.

What they base some they'd gist of missed landry point in his opinion that issued i don't i didn't get to actually let on there please so i can't tell you with any stress what they said both but what i what i can't you is that what the main best of.

He didn't have.

The authority to do what he- and that the way it was in it.

Under the to do.

I think that's that would be argument i would make don't know how they worded it so i can't really give you any more.

Than that.

Now i can tell you what the state you was the.

They are had a- that is animal.

Condition like.

Whether it's a war pay.

That are certain.

That increased eggs.

Power the little.

Process is slow you to write a bill you go to put your minute you got estimated of the floor for debate.

Got a yada so you have a number.

S.

S.

The cut the decorah.

Please allow the governor.

To or the present you know if case to have a bit more.

To say this is what we gotta do we have to respond.

And react to the situation as the part.

And so they sit under.

And numbers.

Everything he did was intended to.

Lives and- protect the public again said.

So that we can minimize the overall damage.

On it make.

Is synced.

Back to.

What are the judge what the judge ruled they're saying that threats of five but was telling state interests and that.

In the past other courts shown a lot of judicial deference to executive action it bonds to a pandemic so whenever you have a federal president somewhere else if it comes up supreme court what is the reason it doesn't really have started decisis which is a doctrine where.

I have to abide by what previous support them and we have a doctor call jurisprudence called the always just means that you have a lot of leeway and weight to what other courts do but it's technically fine and so.

Are you are the- added that it is a pre recorded said.

Gov there's a lot of new responded to.

Shouldn't wanna rock the so is that.

Look that's what he's doing.

In a couple weeks so we really don't know how that's going to shake up there's also the possibility that.

The plaintiffs in this case will appeal we don't know what's going to happen there.

My own a pick.

Everything is that there's been a little bit of legal press the digitization going on in the judge's ruling because it looks like.

They shifted from having the deaths be the state interest to just infection rates because if you look.

Yes we're having it sections five x.

And what.

Other people go to the hospital but the number of mortalities number.

Let's that this is only one down to the point where