Former liberation theology leader calls on Latin American bishops to focus on Christ

Friar Clodovis Boff belongs to the Order of the Servants of Mary. / Credit: Lennoazevedo, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Sao Paulo, Brazil, Jul 12, 2025 / 08:40 am (CNA).

Friar Clodovis Boff has written an open letter to the bishops of the Latin American and Caribbean Bishops’ Council (CELAM, by its Spanish acronym), who recently met in assembly, asking: “What good news did I read there? Forgive my frankness: None. You, bishops of CELAM, always repeat the same old story: social issues, social issues, and social issues. And this has been going on for more than fifty years.”

“Dear older brothers, don’t you see that this music is getting old?” asked the priest who belongs to the Order of the Servants of Mary (Servites), in reaction to the final document of the 40th Ordinary General Assembly of CELAM, held at the end of May in the Archdiocese of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 

"When will you give us good news about God, Christ, and his Spirit? About grace and salvation? About conversion of heart and meditating on the Word? About prayer and adoration, devotion to the Mother of the Lord, and other such themes? In short, when will you send us a truly religious, spiritual message?"

Clodovis Boff, along with his brother Leonardo Boff, was one of the most important philosophers of liberation theology. However, in 2007, he published the article "Liberation Theology and Return to the Fundamentals" in the 68th issue of the Brazilian Ecclesiastical Review. 

There, he stated that "the error of liberation theology…was to have put the poor in the place of Christ, making them a fetish and reducing Christ to having a mere supportive role; when Christ did the opposite: he put himself in the place of the poor, to make them sharers in his divine dignity." 

The letter, written on June 13 — the feast of St. Anthony of Padua, a doctor of the Church — was sent "first and foremost to the president general of CELAM," Cardinal Jaime Spengler, archbishop of Porto Alegre in Brazil, and "to all the presidents of the regional CELAM," Boff told ACI Digital, CNA’s Portuguese-language news partner.

The priest told the bishops that he dared to write to them "because for a long time" he has seen "with dismay, repeated signs that our beloved Church is running a truly grave danger: that of alienating itself from its spiritual essence, to its own detriment and that of the world."

"When the house is on fire, anyone can scream," Boff explained. After reading CELAM's message, something he said he felt almost 20 years ago came back to him, when, "no longer able to bear the repeated equivocations of liberation theology, such an impetus arose from the depths of my soul" and he said: "Enough! I have to speak."

"It was under the impact of a similar inner impulse that I wrote this letter, hoping that the Holy Spirit may have played some part in it," he emphasized. "So far, I have only received the reaction of Don Jaime, president of CELAM, and also of the CNBB," the National Conference of Bishops of Brazil, the friar told ACI Digital.

According to Boff, Spengler, who was his “student back in the 1980s in Petrópolis,” was "receptive to the letter, appreciating the fact that I had expressed my thoughts, which could help revise the ways of the Church in the Americas.”

Boff wrote in his letter that, upon reading the document of the CELAM assembly, “the words of Christ come to mind: The children ask for bread and you give them a stone (Mt 7:9).”

For the friar, “the secular world itself is fed up with secularity and is off searching for spirituality,” but the CELAM bishops “continue to offer them social issues and more social issues; and of the spiritual [you give them], almost only crumbs.”

“And to think that you are the custodians of the greatest treasure, that which the world needs most and yet, in a certain way, you deny it to them,” the priest wrote.

“Souls ask for the supernatural, and you insist on giving them the natural. This paradox is evident even in parishes: While lay people delight in displaying signs of their Catholic identity (crosses, medals, veils, blouses with religious prints), priests and nuns go in the opposite direction and appear without any distinctive sign.”

In their “Message to the Church on pilgrimage in Latin America and the Caribbean,” the CELAM bishops wrote that the 40th Assembly “has been a space for discernment, prayer, and episcopal fraternity,” in which they shared “the lights and shadows” of their “realities, the cries” of their “peoples, and the longing for a Church that is a home and school of communion.”

“[We are] aware of the current challenges that affect us as a Latin American and Caribbean region: the persistence of poverty and growing inequality, violence that goes unpunished, corruption, drug trafficking, forced migration, the weakening of democracy, the cry of the earth, and secularization, among the most common,” the bishops stated.

Boff responded: “You say, without any hesitation, that you hear the ‘cries’ of the people and that you are ‘aware of the challenges’ of today. But does your listening reach deep? Doesn’t it remain on the surface?”

“I read your list of today’s ‘cries’ and ‘challenges’ and see that it goes no further than what the most ordinary journalists and sociologists observe. Don’t the Most Reverends hear that, from ‘the depths of the world,’ a formidable cry for God is rising today? A cry that even many secular analysts hear? And isn’t it to hear this cry and give it a response, the true and full response, that the Church and its ministers exist?” 

"Governments and NGOs are there for the 'social cries'. The Church, without a doubt, cannot exclude herself from this service. But it is not the protagonist in this field. Her proper field of action is another and higher: responding precisely to the 'cry for God,'" he emphasized.

*‘Progressives’ or ‘traditionalists’*

The friar stated in his letter that he knew that bishops “are harassed day and night by public opinion to define themselves as ‘progressives’ or ‘traditionalists,’ ‘right-wing’ or ‘left-wing.’”

“On this, St. Paul is categorical,” he wrote, quoting: Men should consider us simply as servants of Christ and stewards of the mysteries of God (1 Cor 4:1).

“It is worth remembering” that “the Church is, first and foremost, the ‘sacrament of salvation’ and not a mere social institution, progressive or not,” the friar said.

“She exists to proclaim Christ and his grace. That is her central focus, her greatest and enduring commitment. Everything else comes after that,” the priest emphasized.

“Forgive me, dearest friends, if I'm here recalling what you already know. But why then is all of this not mentioned in your message and in the writings of CELAM in general? From reading them, one almost inevitably draws the conclusion that the great concern of the Church today, on our continent, is not the cause of Christ and his salvation, but rather social causes, such as justice, peace, and ecology, which you cite in your message as another refrain.”

The friar also noted that “the very letter that Pope Leo sent to CELAM, in the person of its president, speaks clearly of the ‘urgent need to remember that it is the Risen One who protects and guides the Church, reviving it in hope, etc.’”

“The Holy Father also reminds us that the Church’s proper mission is, in his own words, ‘to go out to meet so many brothers and sisters, to announce to them the message of salvation in Christ Jesus,’” Boff said.

“However, what was the response the venerable brothers gave to the pope? In the letter you wrote to him, there is no echo of those papal warnings. Rather, you asked him to help you, not to keep the memory of the Risen Lord alive in the Church; not to proclaim salvation in Christ to your brothers, but rather to support them in their struggle to ‘encourage justice and peace’ and to ‘support them in denouncing every form of injustice.’ In short, what you made the pope hear was the same old refrain: ‘social issues, social issues...’, as if he, who worked among us for decades, had never heard it.”

Boff was referring to the fact that Pope Leo XIV was a missionary and bishop in Peru and, therefore, familiar with both the social reality of Latin America and the various types of theology and pastoral care practiced on the continent.

“You will say: But these are assumed truths, which do not need to be repeated all the time. No, my dearest ones; we do need to repeat them, with renewed fervor, every blessed day, otherwise they will be lost,” Boff wrote to CELAM.

“If it weren't necessary to keep repeating them, then why did Pope Leo remind you about them? We know what happens when a man takes his wife's love for granted and doesn't bother to nurture it. This is infinitely more important in relation to faith and love for Christ.”

The friar pointed out in his letter that “the vocabulary of faith” such as God, Christ, evangelization, resurrection, Kingdom, mission, and hope “is not lacking” in CELAM's message, but, for him, these are “words placed there in a generic way,” because “one sees nothing of clear spiritual content in them” and “rather, they make one think of the usual refrain ‘social issues, social issues, and more social issues.’” 

“Please consider the first two words, key words and more than elementary words of our faith: ‘God’ and ‘Christ.’ As for ‘God,’ you never mention him in and of himself,” the friar wrote, but “only refer to him in the stereotypical expressions ‘Son of God’ and ‘People of God.’ Brothers, shouldn’t you be astounded?

The name of Christ “appears only twice, and both times only in passing,” Boff observed.

The friar said the bishops “declare,” and “rightly so, that they want a Church that is a ‘house and school of communion,’ and, furthermore, ‘merciful, synodal, and outgoing,’” and that “a Church that does not have Christ as its reason for being and speaking is, in the words of Pope Francis, nothing more than a ‘pious NGO.’”

“But isn't that where our Church is headed? A lesser evil is when, instead of going to the non-religious, Catholics become evangelicals. In every case, our Church is hemorrhaging. What we see most around here are empty churches, empty seminaries, empty convents,” the friar observed.

“In our Americas, seven or eight countries no longer have a Catholic majority. Brazil itself is on its way to becoming ‘the largest ex-Catholic country in the world,’ in the words of a well-known Brazilian writer,” said the friar, referring to the playwright, writer, and journalist Nelson Rodrigues. “However, this continued decline doesn't seem to worry the venerable brothers so much.”

The priest even said that CELAM's message affirms that the [heart of the] Church in Latin America "continues to beat strongly" and that there are "seeds of resurrection and hope," and asked: "But where are these 'seeds', dear bishops? They don't seem to be in the social sphere, as you might imagine, but in the religious sphere. They are especially in the renewed parishes, as well as in the new movements and communities."

"All these expressions of spirituality and evangelization" are "the ecclesial aspect that most fills our churches (and the hearts of the faithful)," he wrote. "It is there, in this spiritual seedbed, where the future of our Church lies. An eloquent sign of that future is that, while in the social sphere, currently, we see almost only 'people with white hair; in the spiritual realm, we see the rush en masse toward the spiritual by today's young people."

“Without the leaven of a living faith, social struggle itself ends up being perverted: from liberating, it becomes ideological and ultimately oppressive,” Boff emphasized. “This is the lucid and grave warning that St. Paul VI issued (in Evangelii Nuntiandi 35.2) regarding the then-nascent ‘theology of liberation’ (a warning from which that theology, it seems, drew no benefit).”

*Where does CELAM want to 'take our Church'?*

"Dear elder brothers, allow me to ask you: Where do you want to take our Church?" Boff asked. The bishops "speak a lot about the 'Kingdom,' but what is the concrete content of their 'Kingdom'?" the friar asked in his open letter.

"Since you speak so much about building a 'just and fraternal society' (another of their refrains), one might think that this society is the central content of the 'Kingdom' that is evoked. I am not unaware of the grain of truth therein. However, the most reverend bishops say nothing about the principal content of the 'Kingdom,' that is, the Kingdom present, both in hearts today and in its consummation tomorrow," he observed.

“In your discourse, there is no eschatology to be seen. It is true: You speak twice of ‘hope,’ but in such an indefinite way that, given the social slant of your message, no one, upon hearing such a word from your mouths, raises their eyes to heaven.”

“Why this reticence in speaking loudly and clearly, as so many bishops of the past did, of the ‘Kingdom of Heaven’ (and also of ‘Hell’), of the ‘resurrection of the dead,’ of ‘eternal life,’ and of other eschatological truths, which offer such great light and strength for the struggles of the present, as well as the ultimate meaning of everything?”

“It is not that the earthly ideal of a ‘just and fraternal society’ is not beautiful and great” the friar noted, “but nothing compares to the Heavenly City (Phil 3:20; Heb 11:10, 16), of which we are fortunately, by our faith, citizens and workers, and you, by your episcopal ministry, its great engineers.”

“It is, therefore, time, and more than time, to bring Christ out of the shadows and into the full light. It is time to restore to him absolute primacy, both in the Church ad intra (in the individual conscience, in spirituality, and in theology), and in the Church ad extra (in evangelization, ethics, and politics),” Boff wrote. “The Church on our continent urgently needs to return to its true center, to return to its ‘first love.’”

“With this, my dearest friends, would I be asking you for something new?” Boff asked. “Absolutely not. I am simply reminding you of the most evident requirement of faith, of the ‘ancient and ever new’ faith: the absolute option for Christ the Lord, the unconditional love for him, required particularly of you, as he did of Peter (Jn 21:15-17).”

For the friar, it is urgent for the bishops “therefore to adopt and practice clearly and decisively a strong and systematic Christocentrism; a truly ‘overwhelming’ Christocentrism, as St. John Paul II expressed it,” and “to live an open Christocentrism that acts as leaven and transforms everything: people, the Church, and society.”

This story was first published by ACI Digital, CNA’s Portuguese-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by ACI Prensa/CNA.