United States: US Supreme Court: City Of Chicago Did Not Violate Automatic Stay By Refusing To Return Impounded Vehicles - Arnold & Porter

Mondaq

20 Jan 2021 0 shares 1 views

United States: US Supreme Court: City Of Chicago Did Not Violate Automatic Stay By Refusing To Return Impounded Vehicles - Arnold & Porter

Mondaq

Published 20 Jan 2021

On January 14, 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that "mere retention" of estate property after the filing of a bankruptcy petition does not violate the automatic stay as set forth in section 362(a)(3)...

Full Article

United States: What Are The Reversal Rates In Criminal Cases For Second, Third, Fourth And Fifth Districts Of The Appellate Court, 1990-2020? - Arnold & Porter

Last time, we reviewed the reversal rates at the Supreme Court in criminal cases for the Divisions of Chicago's First District of..

Mondaq 22 Jan 2021

United States: Supreme Court Rules That "Mere Retention" Of Property Does Not Violate Bankruptcy Code's Automatic Stay Provision - Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.

On January 14, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the City of Chicago did not violate section 362(a)(3) of the..

Mondaq 18 Jan 2021

United States: US Supreme Court: City Of Chicago Did Not Violate Automatic Stay By Refusing To Return Impounded Vehicles - Arnold & Porter

United States: US Supreme Court: City Of Chicago Did Not Violate Automatic Stay By Refusing To Return Impounded Vehicles - Arnold & Porter

You might like

Related news coverage

United States: What Are The Reversal Rates In Criminal Cases For Second, Third, Fourth And Fifth Districts Of The Appellate Court, 1990-2020? - Arnold & Porter

United States: Supreme Court Rules That "Mere Retention" Of Property Does Not Violate Bankruptcy Code's Automatic Stay Provision - Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.

Advertisement