United States: Muldrow Case Recalibrates Title VII "Significant Harm" Standard - Crowell & Moring LLP

Mondaq

25 Apr 2024 0 shares 1 views

United States: Muldrow Case Recalibrates Title VII "Significant Harm" Standard - Crowell & Moring LLP

Mondaq

Published 25 Apr 2024

On April 17, 2023, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 22-193, holding that transferees alleging discrimination under Title VII ...

Full Article

United States: U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Title VII Requires Employees Establish Only "Some Harm" As A Result Of Transfer, Rejecting Lower Court Ruling That Harm Must Be "Significant" To Constitute Discrimination - Ford & Harrison LLP

Can an employer be sued by an employee for an alleged discriminatory transfer? The answer had been yes, so long as the transfer was..

Mondaq 25 Apr 2024

United States: Supreme Court Rejects Heightened Harm Requirement In Title VII Discrimination Case - WilmerHale

On April 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri that an employee challenging a job..

Mondaq 24 Apr 2024

United States: Muldrow Case Recalibrates Title VII "Significant Harm" Standard - Crowell & Moring LLP

United States: Muldrow Case Recalibrates Title VII "Significant Harm" Standard - Crowell & Moring LLP

You might like

Related news coverage

United States: U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Title VII Requires Employees Establish Only "Some Harm" As A Result Of Transfer, Rejecting Lower Court Ruling That Harm Must Be "Significant" To Constitute Discrimination - Ford & Harrison LLP

United States: Supreme Court Rejects Heightened Harm Requirement In Title VII Discrimination Case - WilmerHale

Advertisement